Sunday, August 23, 2015

Traveling Back in Time

This blog has been sitting dormant since six years

Six years. I can hardly believe it. 

Well, to be honest, it was created for a set of classes I took during my teaching internship and its contents related to activities performed and engaged in during said internship. Of course, that era is long gone, and I've just cleaned out a few empty blogs, then deleted.

However, I couldn't bring myself to delete one of them without saving the contents, because they are a record of what I thought and was learning at that time, and I still believe those words to be valuable to my learning experience, even if I find, for example, I've grown beyond some of them, or learn other methods that "outrank" them, or just prove more efficient or student friendly. 

And then on to this one. 

I think this one might have been my favorite--no, forget that, it was my favorite, because it involved real children and not just textbook representations. Well, another one did involve children, children I grew to love so much, though at that blog also was discussed much theory and it was not until later in that year--not written about in the blog--that I was able to implement what I had learned in a more natural way, without reflexively and constantly flipping back through pages.

Looking back at this blog, however, I was brought back in time, to a period in which I was huddled with children and their "friends" (a collection of soft-toy "classmates") and we laughed and cried together as we explored books and how they intersect in the events of our own lives, and how these events color our perceptions and reception of books. And how books can open us up to a lot more

I won't be blogging anymore at this location, but have updated and incorporated one of the entries into a blog I currently run. You can access that entry here. That particular blog, Before the Second Sleep, has lots of book reviews, which may interest you, as well as other areas of interest. Two of note that might pop out are a pair of series I'd launched--one newly minted and one becoming revitalized following a recent cleaning off of my plate: "A Novel Exploration" and "Bonding with Books." 

I'm hoping also to utilize all or at least most of these entries in a similar fashion, and would love to see you join us at the new blog.

Happy August!


*********


Wednesday, March 18, 2009

A real princess is hard to find (JE # 15)

I've been hanging on to the Rachel Isadora version of Princess and the Pea ever since I saw the fairytale included in the Stinky Cheese Man collection. Adam hadn't ever been introduced to this tale, and I was curious to see how he responded to all the Stinky Cheese stories after reading first the "real" versions.

Unconnected to this--for the most part--we visited the library today and picked up The Tale of Despereaux, a book I hadn't realized until after we put it on hold is written by the same author who gives us Edward Tulane. At checkout the librarian reminded us, "There won't be any renewals on this book as the waiting list for it is a mile long!" Later I happened to read through the inside front cover description and saw: "This is the story of Despereaux Tilling, a mouse in love with music, stories and a princess named Pea." I knew then I had to read the Isadora book to him so I could get started with Despereaux. I am so curious to see his response to this princess's name. It's so funny how books come to us, what links one to another, and the connections between them that we do recall.

When I recall the story, I of course remember Hans Christian Andersen's Scandinavian locale, as opposed to this African one. But, really, is the earlier one any more "real" because it came first? Determining which one is more real perhaps is as difficult as finding a real princess. In this story, probably closer to any one most African parents might tell their children, the princess is bruised and made uncomfortable by a pea buried deep beneath dozens of mattresses and feather beds decorated by typically vibrant and expressive African colors and patterns. (Adam said they came from animals, such as the one that had spots like a cheetah, or another lines like a zebra.)

This comes, of course, after the prince had searched the world over for a true princess, someone so delicate, so sensitive. He meets many who claim to be princesses, but none seem quite right. Each one says "Hello" to him in a different tribal language, and Isadora provides the translations for us: "Selam" (Amharic), "Iska Waran" (Somali) and "Jambo, Habari" (Swahili). Interestingly, the author places the translations at the end of the book, a bit of an unfortunate choice in my opinion, but remedied by Adam's understanding of Swahili.

"Why, Adam, do you speak Swahili, dear boy? I say!"

"Nooooooo. I just remember it because Diego went to Africa once and they said it on that show."

And indeed it is so. Diego, animal rescuer cousin to Dora has travelled to Africa and the more I thought about it, the greater recall I had of the way they sang the words. Connections.

I've ordered another version from the library, but what occurred to me as I type is that for Adam, since this is his first exposure to the fairy tale, this may very well be the "real" story.

Tuesday, February 17, 2009

Everywhere the action's at (JE # 9)

Lately Adam is heavily into an old Saturday morning cartoon, Josie and the Pussycats. It started with a book he found at the library, set up in comic book form and probably attractive to him for the colorful pages set up in boxes--a scheme he'd never really seen much of before. Although I was somewhat surprised at first, it grew on me for a couple of reasons, one related to immersion into unconventional mixing of genre and content. During my undergraduate studies we read Maus, an autobiographical work dealing with a young man's struggle to work through his father's nightmarish memories as a Holocaust survivor. The book had been the recipient of some criticism because it was in comic book form and some were offended by the combination of such serious subject matter and its "funnies" backdrop. It re-opened a larger debate about the appropriateness of such an arrangement.

Josie and the Pussycats is hardly Maus; the two are in no way even comparable. But I thought it might be interesting for Adam to read a book in this style that is not necessarily all gags and jokes. The stories in it are not serious, but they do include a pair of siblings who frequently quarrel, one of whom is endlessly trying to gain the attention of Allan, who likes Josie. Alexandra, the jealous sister of Alexander, often does rather mean things to Josie, not unlike Angelica, discussed below, who also presents a new sort of paradigm to challenge. Both are characters who take us rather by surprise, not unlike the way some people in real life might. Alexandra insults Josie's clothes, calls her a "stupid redhead," and frequently puts down her girl group, talking about how it would not ever be successful until she, Alexandra, led it and the band were named after herself. There also are plots involving physical threats to the characters, who frequently encounter dangerous criminals. For a child learning to deal with these types of situations, comic-book format opens up a new way in which to approach handling them, learning to look at them in a different type of way.

Moreover, given the emphasis now being placed in schools on visual literacy, it struck me as helpful that Adam chose to expose himself to this format, not just for developing a base from which to form an awareness of literary matters, but also for the conventions he would be learning. We talked about the differences between stanza and paragraph, episode and chapter, and tonight we finally passed the ordinary bubble that pointed to someone's head--indicating they were saying those words--and the bubble with smaller bubbles beneath it--a character's thoughts--and came upon the print version of "voice over." I explained to Adam that this was neither spoken nor thought by characters, rather it was information for readers to allow them to understand how the story was developing. (In the past I had said, "It is a narrator telling us what is happening, someone who is removed from the story." He seemed to grasp this, although I would want to follow up on this understanding.) In this case, it gave the readers, us, to understand that Alexander, by snapping his fingers, had unwittingly broken a spell the jealous Alexandra had placed on the Pussycats.

As the storyline originated as a children's cartoon in the 60s, there is also a DVD The Best of Josie and the Pussycats, each episode of which starts with the theme song. Although I prefer to limit Adam's access to television watching, there can be benefits. One, for example, is the musical element. Music in the life of a child not only is enjoyable, but seems also to have an emotional appeal that is hard to match. For fun I've included a clip of the show's opener, with various scenes and theme song. Come on along!



Josie and the Pussycats, long tails, and ears for hats
Guitars and sharps and flats
Neat, sweet, a groovy song
You're invited, come along

Hurry, hurry!

See ya all in Persia, or maybe France
We could be in India, or perchance
Be with us in Bangkok, make no difference
Everywhere the action's at, we're involved with this or that

Come on along now!

Josie and the Pussycats, no time for purrs and pats
Won't run when they hear scat
There where the plot begins
Come and watch the good guys win

Josie and the Pussycats
Josie and the Pussycats




And he's big time into holidays. This past Valentine's Day was pretty special for him--any excuse for a party, really. He typically loves to bake, make, buy and create things for people, and this time was no exception. He passed out Valentine's cards for his classmates at school and surprised me by not wanting to take his treasures with him to school. One of them was his themed book: Rugrats: Be My Valentine! It's probably more entertainment than anything, but we still manage to get lots of interesting comments from it, such as standards and transitions in life like growing up and moving out of parents' homes--

"Oh so these, they like, had a fight but they're still brothers."

"Well, I don't know that they had a fight."

"Maybe they moved away 'coz they had a fight, but they're still friends, now they're friends but he married someone else, so he got her, this after they had the fight, they moved away, they married, and they married, she married two times, first they got Tommy, then Dil, and then..."

"Honey, they only lived together when they were little boys. When they grew up they moved out from their parents' house to their own houses."

"Then why did they decide to...ohhhh, I get it, they didn't have a fight, they just wanted their own house. First they look for a wife, and then they decided for a house!"

--and the relationships that make people cousins, and societal celebrations and their origins.

We also get to use the word "butt."

"How come we're eating cookies that look like our butts?" Phil asked. He held his heart cookie upside down.


Tommy and brother Dylan "Dil" Pickles are cousins to Angelica Pickles, and their fathers are brothers. Tommy is sweet, Dil erratic and Angelica, who often steals cookies, mean. In one passage Angelica shoots toy arrows into their midst so as to distract them long enough to steal cookies. Adam understood that each thing happened, but not that each had a singular goal within the story. Having come after Angelica was seen prancing around dressed as Cupid, and later demanding to know if those were cookie crumbs on the floor, the scene with Angelica's trickery was a bit confusing for him at first. I tried scaffolding so Abdul could realize the purpose of those scenes, to build onto his understanding of how pictures tell important details as well as words. I pointed to the babies, whose eyes were all focused in astonishment on the arrow at their feet while, in the background, Angelica sneaks away with a plate of cookies. Listening to the tape was heartwarming in a comedic way.

"What do you think is happening in this picture?"

"They found that from Stu, but it was really from Angelica. She's dancing around, that she found..."

"What's that in her hand?"

"...cookies."

"So somebody just shot an arrow, who do you think did that?"

He points to Angelica.

"Angelica...Why do you think she did that?" His lips are closed again the concentrated way they do, but he is not sad this time, as he was over the fate of Edward Tulane.

"'Coz she didn't mean to but it accidentally went to Stu."

"Well, look at this. If she shot the arrow, and look at all those babies are looking at the arrow. Are they looking at her with the cookies?"

Head shake.

"So what do you think now?"

"She just shot it...?"

"So that they'll watch the arrow and she can sneak away with the cookies maybe."

"Ahhhh," he cries out, smiling, as his focus gives way to understanding. "That was a good trick!" We laughed together and hearing it again on the tape brings joy to my heart. A discovery we shared, and the way our laughter joins on the tape is sort of like the way our hands meet at a crossing, without having to say anything.

"But it wasn't cool." Adam is, after all, a very kind child, many times unusually so. It occurs to me at that moment that he often shows other children things he has recently learned, and I wonder if this episode will join his repertoire. He likes to share. My eyes gleamed as I watched him.

"Yeah, we were laughing but in real life that would be kind of mean."

"It's so dang...bad." I laughed at the way his words had gotten progressively bolded, as if his voice conveyed a font, and one could hear the letters growing on the page, until...they suddenly revert to the ordinary. He was, all in good fun, laughing at my expense, poking fun at my sentimentality and how he was able to exploit it. And that just elevated the happiness within me, for a child's capability to use humor to enable someone to laugh at themself. And my heart sang as it always does at the sound of children's laughter.

The best kind of Valentine's Day present.

Sunday, February 15, 2009

Falling in love, part II (JE # 8)

Adam held Julie, his tiger soft toy, as we started to read more in Edward Tulane. At this point I probably should mention that Julie got her name from a real-life tiger who, along with her brother Ron, made the journey from Canadian zoo to South African sanctuary where, it was hoped, they could be taught how to behave like wild animals, make a home on the continent--where tigers are not--and be the start of a long line of an African species who could help "restock" Asian tiger territory.

Julie the Second had come from the Anchorage Zoo on the same day Adam and I accompanied his pre-school class on a field trip to see the newly-arrived tigers there. From that day early last summer until now, Julie has held a very special place in Adam's heart, much as Edward Tulane does for Abilene. Adam is somewhat of a Build-a-Bear aficionado, and he often uses the clothes and accessories meant for Ariel, his pink leopard, to share with the smaller Julie. When he started kindergarten this year, Julie accompanied him for the first few days, and at night she occupies the area just below his chin and in between his arms.

And in his arms she rested as we prepared to settle back into our previous-night's reading, having just made our way through Circle Time and a book exploration. As the Tulanes prepared for their shipboard journey and Pellegrina stared at Edward, I thought about
how Julie, unlike Edward, loved nothing more than to be held close and even tight, and didn't seem to mind if her clothing became wrinkly. "Well," I thought as I turned the page, "different personalities."

As the shipboard journey gets underway, Edward's misfortune approaches in the form of Amos and Martin, who speak condescendingly to Abiline. "Edward, as usual, was disregarding the conversation."

"What do you think it means to disregard?"

"Not really listening," Violet offered. I asked Adam what he thought.

"Um, 'not guarding.'" I was rather pleased with this answer for a couple of different reasons. First, he didn't merely copy Violet's answer as many children (Adam included) do in some instances. He had the courage--and dramatic as it may sound I do believe it takes a certain amount of courage to proffer a different answer, especially if the first child tends to be perceived, as Violet often is by Adam, to be more clever--he had the courage to say something different when he could easily have saved face by repeating his friend's answer.

I also knew exactly why he answered as he did. We'd been playing with words all his life, and about a year ago I started talking to him about Greek and Latin roots. I've confined it to simple prefixes and suffixes, such as un and less. "What does it mean to be penniless" I would ask; he would answer, in the beginning after haven given it much thought, "You have no pennies!" Unhappy he understood to mean "not happy." Over time he'd been more informally exposed to lots of other word parts and I tried to point out the root meanings as they came up.

So when he defined disregard to mean "not guarding," I was rather impressed, although it did take me by pleasant surprise. Listening to myself on the tape I thought the jaw dropping was practically audible. He was not blurting out answers, rather he was taking the time to think through what was being discussed, and at this stage, for him at least, I thought this was much more important than the right answer.

"You are on the right track! Both of you are so clever! To regard means to 'pay attention,' but to disregard means to..."

"Not pay attention," they chimed.

"I thought it was guard like when someone does...I wasn't on the right track," Adam said, somewhat unhappily.

"You were actually," I assured him, simultaneously remembering those post-modern novels with word play involving spellings and meta-cognition. "You were using your thinking cap, you know why?"

"Why?"

"Because I know that you were thinking about the beginning of the word, dis, and I know that you were breaking down the word and thinking what each part means." I hoped he heard the smile in my words as well as saw it on my face.

"Yeah and there was the guard part."

"Yeah! There you go!"

I loved some of the words that followed: billowed, dashing ("He's thinking to himself, 'I look quite good,'" I said in an affected voice), mortified. We talked about people who too often think very highly of themselves and how the pocket watch rolled toward Abilene.

"But, but it was vacuumed up!" Adam was really showing his prowess today with remembering other details, even if he had forgotten that it had been rescued from the new maid's negligence. But if he felt at all awkward it was relieved by articulation of the word underwear, an utterance I've learned is hilariously scandalous to the kindergarten-first grade set. The children laughed uproariously.

They quietened down when Edward's mortification arrived, but only momentarily.

Edward was paying attention now. He was mortified.

"Awwwwwwweeeeesommme, underwear!" Adam crowed.

"Did his butt show?" Violet wanted to know.

"Probably, he's completely naked."

"Eeeeeewwwwwwww!" the pair of them cried out.

I tried to get back on track by joining in on their act. "'Give him to me!' screamed Abilene. 'He's mine.'" I semi-shouted out the words. The rabbit sailed, naked, through the air as Abilene protested his shameless treatment, tackling one boy as he tried to make a pass to the other.

So it was that Edward Tulane did not go flying back into the dirty hands of Martin. Instead...

"What do you think happened?"

"He broke," Adam said sadly.

Violet agreed. "He broke."

We talked a little bit about techniques of using what one has read so far, including pictures and the title, to provide hints as to what they think might happen. I added in a bit about central characters and their importance to the story; since Edward Tulane's name was in the title...

Instead, Edward Tulane went overboard.

"Into the water?"

Adam let out a wail. "Aaaahhhhh, I'm heartbroken!" He was only partly play acting. "Oh noooooo," he cried softly as Edward began to sink.

And so we made our way through Edward's disaster and Adam's vow, "I'm going to find him!" along with his indignant reply, "He's not a toy!" when the fisherman referred to Edward in this way.

"They think he's just a bunny rabbit," Violet explained.

*********

I am actually typing this about a week or so after the reading took place (and a day after the above segment), and went to get the book to make reference to the next section I was planning to type about. When Adam saw it he made a soft purring sound, the kind of sound a child makes when he cuddles something he loves or cares about. As I continue to type he is flipping through, looking at the pictures, making note of where we left off. Our bookmark actually had gotten replaced into the wrong spot, although I'm not sure if he knows this.

He turns to the picture of Rosie carelessly flipping Edward around in the Tulanes' dining room.

"There's the pee. The mommy should be more upset at what the dog did to him," he said in a low voice, pointing to the limp form of Edward Tulane, "because that's her child['s]."

Then he turns slowly, carefully, thoughtfully. His mouth is closed, he is unsmiling, concentrating.


"He's hiding." Edward is sitting, seemingly forgotten, on a shelf in the doll shop, and Adam is sad.

Then he closes the book and points to the cover.

"He's walking," he says in a whisper. "Because the house of the outside, and a bush right there and the sky and a road." I've read the part of the book in which this scene takes place, but Adam has not, and I am so curious as to what he will say when he gets to that part, given the way his emotions have responded thus far.

Flipping through the book, Adam appears to be looking for something. "This is where we left off." Perched on a post is a crow, the sort that, unbeknown to Adam and Edward both, soon will be cackling at the abused rabbit, who would be trying to talk himself out of the depths of despair by remembering, "I have been loved."

Adam hasn't yet articulated any sort of horrific or happy ending for Edward Tulane, at least not that I recall. This, of course, is why teachers record things--we haven't the memories of children, who know what they know, even when they can't remember it.

"And then his heart talked and it said the names of the stars. Because he really did say the names in his heart." Of course. He must be looking for the part when the rabbit spent time on Lawrence's shoulders, gazing at the stars. But in there also is another memory, I suspect, perhaps the one that even echoes in my own heart. I think this because he is examining the colored picture of Pelligrina reading to Abilene, and I recall that somewhere in this time, Edward had lain in his bed looking at the stars, repeating to himself, as bright as the stars on a moonless night, words that had brought him comfort. Does Adam remember this? He is feeling sad for the rabbit, and I wonder if on some level he turns to this page because he remembers the repetition and how it had made Edward feel comforted, something he so desperately needs now.

"Can you read this part to me, please? Then I will tell you if I remember it. The stars." I read a few lines from the page before chapter twenty three, but he falls into disinterest. It is not the section with the stars. He explains that Edward had lain on his back said the names of the stars in his heart, to console himself.

"Big Dipper, Milky Way, Northern Star." He has positioned himself on his back, on my bed, and I am impressed with his memory. He had asked about the stars several times when we'd been driving. I recall this and wonder how often he thinks of Edward Tulane; it's been awhile since we read it.



"Maybe there's a wolf round that corner," he ventures, pointing to the cover again, drawing Julie close. Wolves exist in Adam's shadow world, the world that exists for all children, I suppose, where scary things lurk. "If he's not real, then why is he walking?"

And my heart melts because in my memory I carry also images and words of his from another discussion we had following the last time we read about Edward. The tape had been full and I hadn't made the blog entries for them yet, so I tried to type as fast as I could after leaving Adam to his sleep. We must have read the part when Edward is kicked from the train; I don't recall all the details, but I do know that after Lucy's howl, I had told him this is what dogs do when they are grieving. And strangely enough I remember my mother, when I was very, very young, telling a friend that she knew So and So (who had been ill) had died during the night, because the woman's dog kept up the same sort of howling until morning. In the passages of my mind her words are almost whispers, to denote their mysterious or even hallowed nature. She often discussed things such as the psyches of dogs and personalities of angels, and now, watching my own child, I wondered what whispers are in his mind. I have this memory from my mother's conversation; how will he remember this book? Domestic dogs are also part of his shadow world, and the way he repeatedly returns to Rosie fascinates me. He fears him, he is upset with him for what he has done to Edward, but seems intrigued by him as well. I was to wonder later, does he want to the dog do be good? Is he trying in his imagination to eliminate his own fears?

And then someone must have commented on Edward's non-status, or referred to him as a toy, and we mentioned it in our post-reading conversation, because Adam had then insisted, "He’s REAL." His voice a combination of indignation and mournfulness, and I can still recall the way it then wavered as he spoke.

"The dog will take him and say ruff ruff and, 'Is this your house?' and Edward will say from his heart, 'Yes’."
"He is walking back to a house on the cover….he is going back to the house where the one was that had him first."

His voice trailed off there, and the ellipses in his voice, with the subsequent silence, marked the words perfectly.

Saturday, February 7, 2009

Swimming in a sea of books (JE # 7)


Last weekend, the day after I read Edward Tulane to Adam and Violet, we gathered in the living room--we being the two children, myself and the rest of the "class": a gaggle of soft toys propped up in an arc around where I was sitting, Circle Time style.

I'd spread a few books out for them to explore, wondering what kinds of responses there would be when presented with more than one book. I also thought it might be a bit different, when recording experiences, to reading to them and might give me some insight into kids and books.

Both children like to read, and although I don't really know much about Violet's reading style or habits at home, I know her mother does indeed read to Violet, who enjoys the Fancy Nancy series. There has never been a time when I've offered to read to the pair of them that Violet has ever indicated disinterest, and at bedtime (at sleepovers) she often asks me to read to them.

This time the two children flipped through the books and giggled periodically after Violet asked, "Is this like station rotation with books?" Adam occasionally picked up his small tiger, Julie, and a little water baby doll, who has had several names, currently Baby, to show each a picture. I wondered if he were indicating based on their interests, since he showed different pictures to different friends. For himself, he tended to focus on Math Curse and All in Just One Cookie. We had received the latter in the mail just the day before and he'd spent nearly an hour repeating the title with different pronunciations ("All in. Just. One. Cookayyyy!") or different voices.

Violet, a first grader who knows how to read-and sometimes reads to Adam--asked me to read the title of a book she indicated.

"The Stinky Cheese Man and Other Fairly Stupid Tales," I said with a stress as if I were reading it for the very first time.

Both children howled with laughter. When I listened later to the tape, Adam's deep belly laugh in of itself made me giggle. There really is nothing like children's laughter.

They repeated the name over and over again, seemingly delighting in the ability to say stupid uncensored, and I remembered reading in the text about objectionable phrases and varying responses depending on families' perspectives, values, etc. I asked them what they thought of the title.

Was it funny to say the word stupid?

"Yeah, but we couldn't say it in class," Violet said in a warning voice.

"Well," Adam chimed in, "only when you're just reading it."

Do you think there are some times when you might be able to say the word stupid?”

“Yeah."

"What might be one of those times?"

Stupid Tales.” Violet wanted to get back into the conversation.

"When you’re reading the title of a book?"

“Yeah."

“What if the word stupid is in a book?”

“Um...”

“Would you be able to say it out loud?”

“Hey this isn’t a stupid tale!”

“What if you were reading a book to us and someone, a character in the book, said, "You are so stupid." Would you stop or would you keep reading to us? Would you read those words out loud?”

"Keep reading,” called out the children in unison.

The children, while not exactly bored with this conversation, didn't seem to find it unusual. It wasn't really one that piqued their interest and Violet began commenting on some pictures she'd seen, flipping through a book as we chatted. "Oh my god, he's in his normal clothes!"

"All in Just One Cookie!" cried Adam.

"He's like, 'Whatever.'" (She might have been looking at Terrific. I had been somewhat swept away by our text's many recommen-
dations and made a trip to the library.)

"They're trying to build a cookie. They're trying to cook it."

Violet was thumbing through Frankenstein Makes a Sandwich and we talked briefly about how many people think Frankenstein is the monster, when actually his creator is called Dr. Frankenstein. She pointed to a picture of a barber: "Is that Dr. Frankenstein?"

After this the children flipped through other books and Adam ran to get a library choice of his own, Josie and the Pussycats. I don't know what attracted him to it, but perhaps the comic-book style. I pointed out to the children the differences between the words in this books and those in All in Just One Cookie. I had previously explained the bubbles to Adam, and this time he repeated the words in Cookie as they appeared over a map. (He loves maps.) I asked him what he thinks it mans to see "chocolate" with a line pointing towards one place, and "eggs" with a line pointing to another, and so on.

"It's telling you where you can find the stuff."

After another brief sentence about boxes with words in them compared to bubbles with words, we talked again about the difference in what it means and also how it appears. This time I let the children do the explaining. They would both be good teachers of this stuff, I recall thinking.

Since they had two books open I chose the moment also to talk about pictures and differences, such as faces being rounded in one book, elongated in another. Style. "Different but both nice," Violet added.

Teachers.


A mile in someone else's skates (JE # 6)


Did I say Adam did not see Otis as a sympathetic character?

He couldn't figure out if Mrs. Spofford is aware of the hair-cutting incident--when Otis cut the hair of a girl who'd ripped buttons off his shirt, exposing his accidentally-dyed-pink-in-the-wash undershirt. He concedes it was wrong for Otis to do this, but the button ripping, that was not OK.

Last we read, Otis was on his way to Saturday skating and when he gets there he begins to realize, as did Adam as we read, that this time the kids are simply not happy with him. They avoid him, point and talk secretively, laugh at his misfortunes on the ice and generally seem pleased when Ellen and Austine make off with his boots, leaving him no choice but to chase after them in his ice skates. Even the other boys, Otis is dismayed to learn, conspire with the girls to keep Otis bootless. When he finally catches up he is breathless and achy, his feet in absolute agony.

It was the second trick Ellen had played on Otis. In class, the day he had cut a thick lock of her hair off, she had reminded Otis and their peers of his pink undershirt disgrace by calling him "Big Chief Pink Underwear." He'd demanded she retract it, she did, and then revealed she had "kings"--she had been crossing her fingers behind her back, the signal that means the person is not speaking the truth or will not keep a promise.

And now here she was at it again. He admits to himself it was a good joke, and she'd gotten even, but still...

Adam looked back over the pictures of a dejected Otis watching with resignation as the girls scramble away with his footwear; being left behind by the boys as they went for hot dogs without him; as he walks from the bus stop to his home, blades digging simultaneously into his feet as well as the cement. He pointed to the picture of Otis walking in ice skates and drew to my attention that there appeared to be sparks coming up from the ground each time his foot struck.

While I am no artist, I suppose it is fair to say these are rather simple pictures, yet they convey quite a lot and Adam wasn't missing much. He commented on Otis's puffed out, annoyed cheeks, his slumped back, that he looked...hurt.

"Perhaps," I commented, "this is the 'come-uppance' Mrs. Gitler referred to earlier."

As is often the case, things often don't work out exactly as one thinks they might, and Adam's pity for the wayward Otis soon turned to a sort of delight when Ellen and Austine approach him. Otis, whose apology Ellen had rejected, sat on the steps of his apartment building, aching but now relieved that he may get his boots back.

The girls force Otis to promise he will stop teasing Ellen. "And cross your heart and hope to die and stew and fry," repeated Austone firmly. Adam was almost bursting with excitement, partly because he knew something was going to happen, as the book was over in one page, partly because he didn't know what it was. But he seemed to be aware the book would end wth a bit of a bang. "It had to," as he said later, when we discussed the ending.

I'd tried to hide the last illustration as it gave away what happened, but when he saw it, he gave out a whoop as if he'd scored a precious victory. And I suppose he did.

Wednesday, February 4, 2009

Brown paper packages tied up in strings...

When I was a little girl, my mother and I were in the habit of going for walks. There was something poetic about these walks, partly because we talked a great deal about the natural world set out all around us: what we could see and what lay buried beneath the cold winter's snow. But also, as we walked through the sometimes terrifically cold and windy evenings--I recall our winter walks the best--we spoke silly rhymes and recited poetry, even if it were only a few lines from each poem we wanted to talk about.

In moments like these I suspect my mother was a lover of words and, had she been born later, may have had opportunity to develop her fascination, but for then we roamed the streets and fields, calling out the name of the first thing we set our eyes on after we opened them, then trying to come up with words to rhyme. Sometimes these would be phrases, nonsense ones even, or sentences that we took turns stringing together, spinning a yarn in verse.

On one particular evening we were probably about 15 minutes from home when we decided to go back. It was especially cold and the wind had picked up. She told me of a time when all the snow from the park we were just then passing had blown in a drift to the line of houses across the street from the front most area of the park, completely closing off the entrances. That memory of hers seemed to make the cold colder, the wind nippier, my desire to hold my coat closer to me, stronger. We took out a package of soft chocolates and, as was our wont, passed to each other one. They were medicinal, created for our long and arduous outings, made to gives us strength against the arctic chill. And we sang words to give us the strength to make it back to camp.

It was cold
And bold
The night not yet old

In the fold

'til untold
were my rolds

to help me hold
from the cold...

She seemed satisfied when I laughed my childlike laugh and acknowledged the "not-quite" rhyme in there. I'd always assumed she knew the words that were meant to be represented, but I also know now what she was looking for. She understood something about the connection between the way we use words, what we know about them and our cognitive abilities later. As a talented nurse she was an authority on health, but unschooled in language arts. Later I wondered what she'd learned in nursing school about brain development and how much of it she carried with her. She read a lot of journals, but generally to do with psychiatry, and was a fan of Edgar Allen Poe, so all things considered, she did have a pretty strong lay base. But I believe she also had an instinct.

Years later, having read that walking during pregnancy helps speed up delivery, I now have wound up with a child of my own who loves words and walking as much as my mother and I both did. In fact, he recognized the alliteration of that very word pair when he declared his love for the two. I explained to him what it is called and he tipped his head, as if trying to remember, then gave it a single shake as if to dismiss the effort, for he could not. At least not from this time. We went on to discuss stories from our respective childhoods.

"When you were a baby, I used to sing silly songs to you, made up as I went along but to the tune of other songs."

"What are they?"

"You remember one of them--it has lasted all this time." Together we sang.

I love the way that my baby boy smiles
For him I'd walk over one hundred miles.
I could go out in the fields and then bring
all of the sunshine right back in for him.

When the dog bites

When the bee stings

When I'm feeling sad

I simply remember my favorite things
and then I don't feel so bad.